May be a different way to ask this question is would it make sense to have some of the header files associated with the message/errr definitions under the upstart directory LGPLed.
This would make it simpler for people to write other forms of client libraries for communication with Upstart? Does this make sense? Sarvi >-----Original Message----- >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of >Matthias Urlichs >Sent: Thursday, June 12, 2008 12:01 PM >To: Saravanan Shanmugham (sarvi) >Cc: [email protected] >Subject: Re: Upstart Client Library >Importance: High > >Hi, > >Saravanan Shanmugham (sarvi): >> This sounds like Upstart is proposing a hard dependendency on D-Bus. > >It proposes a hard dependency on the d-bus library and protocol. >(There needs to be *some* way of talking to init ... and the >d-bus protocol seems to be reasonably sane for doing this kind >of thing) > >It does not propose a hard dependency on the system d-bus daemon. >(That'd make no sense, as init needs to be controllable >without any system services running; conversely, you might >want to start dbus from the boot ramdisk before switching to >the "real" init daemon.) > >-- >Matthias Urlichs | {M:U} IT Design @ m-u-it.de | >[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Disclaimer: The quote was selected randomly. Really. | >http://smurf.noris.de > - - >There is no fear in love; but perfect love casteth out fear. > >-- >upstart-devel mailing list >[email protected] >Modify settings or unsubscribe at: >https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/upstart-devel > -- upstart-devel mailing list [email protected] Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/upstart-devel
