On Fri, 2008-06-13 at 08:52 -0700, Saravanan Shanmugham (sarvi) wrote: > So any application or platform that would like to use Upstart and would > like to talk to it using a client library would need to be GPLed? Or do > unnatural acts like introduce an proxy process inbetween just to avoid > this? > I think that is an argument for a standard communication proxy between disparate applications on a machine, D-Bus provides this quite nicely.
> But like Michael points out though, just being able to use libdbus > without the rest of the D-Bus baggage, certainly paves a way out. > You would need to have the D-Bus daemon, otherwise there's little useful you can do. > We are hoping to find a stable point in the Upstart devlopment tree with > dbus support and without cgroups(it introduces a kernel version > dependency that we can't handle) and start a testing/hardening effort, > that we would like to contribute back to Upstart. Is there a good point > that you would suggest for us to start doing the above? > The 0.5.0 release will be this. Scott -- Have you ever, ever felt like this? Had strange things happen? Are you going round the twist?
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- upstart-devel mailing list [email protected] Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/upstart-devel
