Reply in-line :- On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 12:42, Garrett Cooper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
<snipped> > SysV init has been doing this type of thing for ages -- just in a more > dumbed down form with runlevels. Hi Garett, Thank you for getting back so quickly. Thank you for sharing that. > Upstart brings a number of improvements to the table, but AFAIK there > hasn't been a push (nor should there be IMO) for upstart to do more > than handle initial process(es) and job(s). I really don't see the > added benefit in making Upstart into a system swiss army knife of > sorts, because that just makes Upstart into a userlevel mini-kernel > ;). Could you make it easier for me to understand what you are saying. >From what I read it seems people seem to go to the same conclusion as I (but from a different perspective ) https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-devel-discuss/2008-September/005493.html > -Garrett -- Regards, Shirish Agarwal This email is licensed under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ 065C 6D79 A68C E7EA 52B3 8D70 950D 53FB 729A 8B17 -- upstart-devel mailing list [email protected] Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/upstart-devel
