On Thu, 2009-12-03 at 18:18 +0200, Janne Karhunen wrote: > On Thu, Dec 3, 2009 at 5:23 PM, Scott James Remnant <[email protected]> > wrote: > > >> > Things like PAM sessions, users being able to start/stop their own jobs, > >> > etc. all come into play. > >> > >> Hmm, some sort of basic draft attached. Any pointers where > >> this goes wrong? > >> > > Yes, it doesn't address the difference between a setuid process and > > running a process "as a user" (which suggests a full PAM session). > > Fair enough. Would you be fine with it if we separate > that as two stanzas - setuid and the user one with full > PAM support? > Yes, but I don't want to introduce one without the other.
Scott -- Have you ever, ever felt like this? Had strange things happen? Are you going round the twist?
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- upstart-devel mailing list [email protected] Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/upstart-devel
