On Thu, 2009-12-03 at 16:25 +0200, Janne Karhunen wrote: > On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 10:38 PM, Scott James Remnant <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > I've deliberately omitted this functionality for now, because it's far, > > far more complex than just adding a setuid() call to the child process. > > > > Things like PAM sessions, users being able to start/stop their own jobs, > > etc. all come into play. > > Hmm, some sort of basic draft attached. Any pointers where > this goes wrong? > Yes, it doesn't address the difference between a setuid process and running a process "as a user" (which suggests a full PAM session).
Scott -- Have you ever, ever felt like this? Had strange things happen? Are you going round the twist?
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- upstart-devel mailing list [email protected] Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/upstart-devel
