Excerpts from Marc Weber's message of Mon Dec 13 03:06:38 +0100 2010: > Excerpts from Adam Chlipala's message of Mon Dec 13 01:46:11 +0100 2010: > > Thanks. The other important question is whether, when you look at the > > code, you also expect it to output two lines, not just one.
gcc-4.1.2 and 4.04 behaves the same - it prints one line only. Don't think we have to try 3.9 It doesn't matter whether this is a gcc bug or not. It would be nice if we could trust the result even if gcc contained a bug. :-/ I've no clue how often this code resulting in bad behaviour is generated by urweb. That's one reason why a js target could be nice. because you don't have to know C extensions .. You'd get PHP code for free: http://phpjs.berlios.de/ (JS interpreter being written in PHP - joking) Marc Weber _______________________________________________ Ur mailing list [email protected] http://www.impredicative.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ur
