Karn Kallio wrote:
Well, looking at the code I thought that it should output both,
because gcc
is supposed to support non-constant initializers. But I am not really any
help, because I do not know enough about gcc to say. One thing that I do
notice in your example is that the printf should be leaving an integer in the
__uwf_1 position of tmp but how could there be space for it (as uw_unit should
occupy 0 size) ...
I think this is a confusion between the comma separator between
initializer elements and the comma operator in expressions. I think my
use of parentheses triggers interpretation as the latter, not the former.
I'm going to try to figure out the GCC bug report procedure and submit
this test case.
_______________________________________________
Ur mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.impredicative.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ur
