http://www.jems.com/news_and_articles/columns/Wesley/cpap_saves_lives_and_money.html
CPAP Saves Lives and Money

   - Keith Wesley, MD, FACEP
   - Street Science
   - 2008 Jul 13

*Review of: *Hubble MW, Richards ME and Wilfong DA: "Estimates of
cost-effectiveness of prehospital continuous positive airway pressure in the
management of acute pulmonary edema." Prehospital Emergency Care.
12(3):277-85, 2008.

*The Science
*This study is by the same authors who showed that prehospital CPAP reduced
mortality by 18% and intubation by 16%. They follow that study with this
assessment of the financial implications of instituting prehospital CPAP.
The accurately lists the cost of this implementation in their system, It
then goes far beyond that to examine the cost of hospitalization across the
nation as it's reported in many articles.

In this paper, the authors conservatively overestimate that the cost to
implement CPAP during one year -- including the cost of equipment, supplies
and training -- was $10,686. They used CPAP 120 times a year, or about four
times per 1,000 patient transports, at a cost of $89. This resulted in 0.75
lives saved for every 1,000 patients treated at a cost of $490.

Their criteria were that non-intubated patients had an average hospital stay
of about five days versus 10 days for the intubated patient (five days of
which are spent in the ICU at a cost of three to four times that of the
general ward) Using this criteria, the hospital cost savings was $499,717.
This resulted in a total savings of $489,031, after accounting for the cost
of equipment, supplies and training. In their system, they used CPAP 120 so
that equated to a savings of $4,075 per CPAP use.

They further conclude the number needed to treat (NNT) to avoid an
intubation is 6. Their final conclusion is that prehospital CPAP is a
cost-effective treatment.

*The Street
*Finally we're getting research that will make "cents" to those that come up
with the inane rules and regulations that haunt our existence in EMS. We
need to prove that what we do saves not only lives, but more importantly for
others we need to prove that what we do saves *money *. Until we can do
that, we'll forever be at the mercy of those others who would prefer our
patients just call a taxi.

The authors have provided an honest and unbiased approached that I challenge
every system to mirror when implementing a new strategy of care. In fact,
they were overly conservative in their estimates. Despite the phenomenal
reduction they experienced in morality and intubation, they recognized many
systems haven't seen that same degree of reduction and therefore took a
conservative estimate of hospital length-of-stay reduction. Using their more
aggressive intubation reduction model, they estimate that the hospital
savings would have been $1,118,050. This would result in a cost savings of
$9,317 per CPAP use.

If you're finding it hard to fund the cost of CPAP, look to your receiving
hospital. Ask them the following questions: How many patients with pulmonary
edema did you bring to them last year? How many were intubated on arrival or
shortly after arrival? How many went to the ICU? Ask them about the
patients' average lengths of stay, and have them separate out ICU and
general ward days. What was the average hospital charge? What was the
hospital mortality rate? Then provide them with this paper and the ones
listed in the bibliography.

On another note, I hope someone in Washington is reading this or has read
this paper and recognizes that EMT-basics who use CPAP are providing ALS
skills. Therefore, they should be able charge on the ALS fee screen to bill
for the cost of the CPAP circuit, because the data shows they're saving
Medicare money by decreasing hospital length-of-stay.
*JEMS.com Editor's Note: *Dr. Wesley further discusses adding CPAP to the
EMT-B scope of practice in his article, "The 'Basic' Skill of CPAP." To read
it,  click here to download a pdf of the October 2007 *JEMS *supplement,
"State of the Science".
<http://www.jems.com/resources/supplements/State_of_the_Science.html;jsessionid=636B2080E4F3BEFE2D2E0327673C5001>

-- 
Stéphan Gascon

Répondre à