En fait, je n'utilise qu'Ottawa, pas par patriotisme - je pr�f�re Nexus pour le rachis cervical que le crit�res d'Ottawa, bcp trop longs.  Les crit�res du genou, toutefois, semblent nettement moins connus des urgentologues, et comme plusieurs des traumas aux genoux atterrissent en clinique d'orthop�die o� les orthos les passent au Roentgen de toute fa�on, et donc l'�conomie r�alis�e � l'urgence est aussit�t annul�e.
 
Denis
----- Original Message -----
Sent: 26 novembre, 2001 05:36
Subject: URG-L: Pittsburgh Lions vs Ottawa Bears

Oui en comparaison pittsburgh est plus sensible, mais la question c'est "est-ce que vous urtilisez l'une ou l'autre oou le resultat le plus prudent de l'une et l'autre successivement ?

(9. Seaberg DC, Yealy DM, Lukens T, et al: Multicenter comparison of two clinical decision rules for the use of radiography in acute, high-risk knee injuries. Ann Emerg Med 32:8-13, 1998   Full Text )
 

Annals of Emergency Medicine
Volume 32 • Number 1 • July 1998
Copyright � 1998 American College of Emergency Physicians
CLINICAL INVESTIGATION
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Multicenter Comparison of Two Clinical Decision Rules for the Use of Radiography in Acute, High-Risk Knee Injuries

David C Seaberg MD*
Donald M Yealy MD
Thomas Lukens MD, PhDII
Thomas Auble PhD
Susan Mathias RN�
 

From the University of Florida Health Science Center, Jacksonville, FL* ; the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center and Mercy Hospital,� Pittsburgh, PA; and MetroHealth Medical Center, Cleveland, OH.II

Received for publication September 7, 1996.
Revisions received May 19, September 4, and December 29, 1997.
Accepted for publication January 23, 1998.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Presented at the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine Annual Meeting, Denver, CO, May 1996.
Copyright � 1998 American College of Emergency Physicians.
Reprint no. 47/1/90757
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Address for reprints: David C Seaberg, MD, Division of Emergency Medicine, University of Florida Health Science Center, 655 West Eighth Street, Jacksonville, FL 32209

Study objective: Two separate clinical decision rules, one developed in Ottawa and the other in Pittsburgh, for the use of radiography in acute knee injuries have been previously validated and published. In this study, the rules were prospectively validated and compared in a new set of patients.

Methods: A prospective, blinded, multicenter trial was conducted in the emergency departments of three urban teaching hospitals. A convenience sample of 934 patients with knee pain requiring radiographs was enrolled. A standardized data form was completed for each patient, comprising the 10 clinical variables included in the two rules. Standard knee radiographs were then taken in each patient. The rules were interpreted by the primary investigator on the basis of the data sheet and the final radiologist radiograph rea

Répondre à