-----
> Author
>   Ausejo, M;  Saenz, A;  Pham, B;  Kellner, JD;  Johnson, DW;  Moher, D;
Klassen, TP
> Title
>   Glucocorticoids for croup.
> Source
>   Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. Issue 4, 2001.
> Abstract
>   Background:
>
>   Since the last meta-analysis in 1989, a number of randomised trials on
the benefit of glucocorticoids have been published, resulting in an
increasing interest in the use of glucocorticoids to treat outpatients with
croup. The objective of this review was to provide evidence to guide
clinicians in their treatment of patients with croup, to examine the
effectiveness of glucocorticoids in these patients, and to identify areas of
uncertainty for future research.
>
>   Objectives:
>
>   To determine the effect of glucocorticoids for children with croup.
>
>   Search strategy:
>
>   We searched The Cochrane Controlled Trials Register, MEDLINE (January
1966 to August 1997) and Excerpta Medica/EMBASE (January 1974 to August
1997). We also contacted (by mail) authors of identified croup trials
published in the last five years to inquire about other trials, published or
unpublished.
>
>   Selection criteria:
>
>   Meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials that examine the
effectiveness of glucocorticoid treatment in children with croup.
>
>   Data collection and analysis:
>
>   Data were extracted using a structured form, which captured patient
status (inpatient or outpatient), intervention and control, with the name of
the drug, route of administration and dose. Data were also collected on the
primary outcome measures comprised of a clinical croup score at baseline (as
well as any other subsequent assessment times), length of stay (hours),
patients status improved (yes/no), and use of co-interventions. The quality
of the trials was assessed using empirically derived items that involved
scales and components.
>
>   Two researchers (TPK, MA) then selected studies as being potentially
relevant based on a review of the titles and abstracts, if available. The
complete text of these studies was then retrieved. All studies that had been
retrieved were reviewed independently by two reviewers (AS, TPK). Data were
extracted by one reviewer (MA) and checked for accuracy by a second reviewer
(TPK). Two observers independently assessed quality (MA, JK), and inter
rater agreement was measured by the intra class correlation. Differences
were resolved by consensus.
>
>   Main results:
>
>   Twenty-four studies were deemed relevant for inclusion (N=2221).
Glucocorticoid treatment was associated with an improvement in the croup
severity score at 6 hours with an effect size of -1.0 (95% confidence
interval -1.5 to -0.6) and at 12 hours -1.0 (-1.6 to -0.4); at 24 hours this
improvement was no longer significant (-1.0, -2.0 to 0.1). There was a
decrease in the number of adrenaline treatments needed in children treated
with glucocorticoids: a decrease of 9% (95% confidence interval 2 to 16%)
among those treated with budesonide and of 12% (4 to 20%) among those
treated with dexamethasone. There was also a decrease in the length of time
spent in accident and emergency (-11 hours, 95% confidence interval -18 to 4
hours), and for inpatients hospital stay was reduced by 16 hours (-31 to 1
hour). Publication bias seems to play a part in these results.
>
>   Conclusions:
>
>   Dexamethasone and budesonide are effective in relieving the symptoms of
croup as early as 6 hours after treatment. Fewer co-interventions are used
and the length of time spent in hospital is decreased in patients treated
with glucocorticoids.
Future trials may want to explore which dose of dexamethasone is most
effective: is 0.15 mg/kg really as effective as 0.6 mg/kg? This
meta-analysis supports the use of glucocorticoids to treat any patient with
croup who has any signs of respiratory distress.
>

Répondre à