On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 7:56 PM, antonio bergnoli <a.bergn...@gmail.com> wrote: > Is it possible to link urjtag with libusb1? If so, how can i configure it > and which is the advantage?
I think the default is still libusb-0.1 and there is no option to use libusb-1.0 as of now. But if you are using libftdi-1.0 to replace libftdi, then you are indirectly using libusb-1.0. You get better performance with libusb-1.0 and libftdi-1.0 if the code is re-written to take advantage of the asynchronous API provided by libusb-1.0 and libftdi-1.0. Commit: http://urjtag.git.sourceforge.net/git/gitweb.cgi?p=urjtag/urjtag;a=commit;h=ad53771377357e1f10206b2916069373fda01122 Explanation: http://developer.intra2net.com/mailarchive/html/libftdi/2010/msg00065.html -- Xiaofan http://mcuee.blogspot.com ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ThinkGeek and WIRED's GeekDad team up for the Ultimate GeekDad Father's Day Giveaway. ONE MASSIVE PRIZE to the lucky parental unit. See the prize list and enter to win: http://p.sf.net/sfu/thinkgeek-promo _______________________________________________ UrJTAG-development mailing list UrJTAG-development@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/urjtag-development
