On Wednesday, June 23, 2010 13:00:25 Mike Frysinger wrote: > On Wednesday, June 23, 2010 10:09:15 Xiaofan Chen wrote: > > The problem is that I am interested in both J-Link and > > FT2232 based driver. I could not find a way to enable both. > > dont use libusb-1.0 then. both work fine with lbusb-0.x. jlink needs > fixing as it only works with libusb-0.x. so someone will have to port it > to libusb-1.x in order to make it work.
weeeeell i might have misunderstood the libusb-1.0 support in urjtag. which is to say there isnt any. support for urjtag on top of libftdi-1.0 on top of libusb-1.0 is there, but urjtag itself doesnt care about the libusb layer in this configuration. since i have a new cable driver locally that is directly affected, i'm in the process of porting urjtag to libusb-1.0 right now. should have it done soonish. for the other cable drivers (like the jlink), i have no way of testing them so someone will have to give them a sanity spin. -mike
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ThinkGeek and WIRED's GeekDad team up for the Ultimate GeekDad Father's Day Giveaway. ONE MASSIVE PRIZE to the lucky parental unit. See the prize list and enter to win: http://p.sf.net/sfu/thinkgeek-promo
_______________________________________________ UrJTAG-development mailing list UrJTAG-development@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/urjtag-development
