On 03/12/2010 11:20 p.m., Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Friday, December 03, 2010 17:46:29 Gaston Rodriguez wrote:
>> I'm using UrJtag to program/erase Actel Fpgas. With previous urjtag (rev
>> 1737) works fine. The ERASE file is executed in about 53 seconds. But
>> with latest UrJtag (rev 1868) the player reach the line 110 of the SVF
>> file and never finishes.
> please narrow it down. use git and you can use the automated bisect.
> -mike
Hi Mike!
What is the format of the revision string used in git?
I see an example for the linux kernel:
$ git bisect start
$ git bisect bad # Current version is bad
$ git bisect good v2.6.13-rc2 # v2.6.13-rc2 was the last version
# tested that was good
I tried with:
git bisect good 1737
git bisect good v1737
git bisect good r1737
And allways get:
fatal: Needed a single revision
Bad rev input: (string)
Sorry for the newbie question...
Gastón.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
What happens now with your Lotus Notes apps - do you make another costly
upgrade, or settle for being marooned without product support? Time to move
off Lotus Notes and onto the cloud with Force.com, apps are easier to build,
use, and manage than apps on traditional platforms. Sign up for the Lotus
Notes Migration Kit to learn more. http://p.sf.net/sfu/salesforce-d2d
_______________________________________________
UrJTAG-development mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/urjtag-development
