On Wednesday, May 11, 2011 20:32:16 Andrew Dyer wrote: > The addresses you are using look weird. I don't remember whether urjtag > uses virtual or physical addresses, but the first boot code would be at > 0xbfc00000 or 0x1fc00000 depending on which address is used.
urjtag itself doesnt force any convention. it is entirely up to the bus driver as to how addresses are interpreted. -mike
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Achieve unprecedented app performance and reliability What every C/C++ and Fortran developer should know. Learn how Intel has extended the reach of its next-generation tools to help boost performance applications - inlcuding clusters. http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-dev2devmay
_______________________________________________ UrJTAG-development mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/urjtag-development
