On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 11:16:25AM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote: > On Wednesday, May 11, 2011 20:32:16 Andrew Dyer wrote: > > The addresses you are using look weird. I don't remember whether urjtag > > uses virtual or physical addresses, but the first boot code would be at > > 0xbfc00000 or 0x1fc00000 depending on which address is used. > > urjtag itself doesnt force any convention. it is entirely up to the bus > driver as to how addresses are interpreted. > -mike
This is what I get: jtag> detectflash 0x1fc00000 dev ID=0000 man ID=0010 amd_detect: mid 10, did 0 Flash not found! jtag> peek 0x1fc00000 bus_read(0x1fc00000) = 0x10 (16) jtag> detectflash 0xbfc00000 amd_detect: mid 0, did 0 Flash not found! jtag> peek 0xbfc00000 bus_read(0xbfc00000) = 0x00000000 (0) Any other hints? Luka ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Achieve unprecedented app performance and reliability What every C/C++ and Fortran developer should know. Learn how Intel has extended the reach of its next-generation tools to help boost performance applications - inlcuding clusters. http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-dev2devmay _______________________________________________ UrJTAG-development mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/urjtag-development
