On 08/08/2012 13:26, Gaston Rodriguez wrote:
>> I think it's caused by the the different UrJTAG version used.
>> You explained that you had automatically generated the C source code, is it
>> possible to regenerate it for the new UrJtag version?
>> If you don't have the time to do so, could you send me your automation 
>> scripts
>> and explain me briefly how to proceed, in order to move formward with this
>> interesting UrJTAG binding?
> Ok, I will send to you my scripts by private message.
> Thanks!
> Gastón
>
I've been lucky to update and build Tclurjtag to the latest Urjtag 
version for myself, so I've updated it in my google-code repository, 
adding the autogeneration scripts and a little Readme.txt for the 
instructions to build the extension for windows:
http://code.google.com/p/gasty-projects/downloads/detail?name=Tclurjtag-0.20.zip&can=2&q=

Please Jean-Brieuc give it a try and give me some feedback about it.

Thanks,
Gastón.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Live Security Virtual Conference
Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and 
threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions 
will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware 
threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/
_______________________________________________
UrJTAG-development mailing list
UrJTAG-development@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/urjtag-development

Reply via email to