> As I already said, I am thinking also about implementing these > functions into > OpenOCD instead of UrJtag. > + there is much more activity at the OpenOCD project than at UrJtag > + the Jim-Tcl implementation is also pretty useful > - the main object of OOCD is debugging of software - not testing / > debugging > of circuits > - OpenOCD doesn't allow multiple devices in a chain to be active (not > bypassed)
Yeah, its sad to see urjtag slowly dying. Because actually, as you said, the interconnection test hasn't anything to do with CPU debugging (which is OpenOCD for). Actually I'm surprised OpenOCD has a SVF player integrated, because the main use is flashing CPLDs, isn't it? And IMHO urjtag has the better codebase, at least this was the case some years ago. This is just my opinion. -michael ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ What NetFlow Analyzer can do for you? Monitors network bandwidth and traffic patterns at an interface-level. Reveals which users, apps, and protocols are consuming the most bandwidth. Provides multi-vendor support for NetFlow, J-Flow, sFlow and other flows. Make informed decisions using capacity planning reports.http://sdm.link/zohodev2dev _______________________________________________ UrJTAG-development mailing list UrJTAG-development@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/urjtag-development
