A new release with what's currently in snapshots would be great.

Regards

2016-12-05 8:41 GMT+01:00 Benjamin Henrion <zoo...@gmail.com>:
> On Sun, Dec 4, 2016 at 9:24 PM, Geert Stappers <stapp...@debian.org> wrote:
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> Urjtag is already in Debian.
>>
>> The previous maintainer asked for adaption by a new maintainer.
>>  ( https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=796820 )
>>
>> It is me who is stepping forward.
>>  ( https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=796820#35 )
>>
>>
>> With this e-mail introduce I myself.
>>
>> Geert Stappers  Linux System engineer as day job, at night also computer
>> and electronics related stuff. Earlier in my career I did electronic
>> design. an upcoming hobby projects will be my first encounter with JTAG.
>>
>> I want to do that with a recent version of urjtag in Debian.
>
> We should make a release at some point, 0.10 is way too old.
>
> --
> Benjamin Henrion <bhenrion at ffii.org>
> FFII Brussels - +32-484-566109 - +32-2-3500762
> "In July 2005, after several failed attempts to legalise software
> patents in Europe, the patent establishment changed its strategy.
> Instead of explicitly seeking to sanction the patentability of
> software, they are now seeking to create a central European patent
> court, which would establish and enforce patentability rules in their
> favor, without any possibility of correction by competing courts or
> democratically elected legislators."
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> _______________________________________________
> UrJTAG-development mailing list
> UrJTAG-development@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/urjtag-development

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
UrJTAG-development mailing list
UrJTAG-development@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/urjtag-development

Reply via email to