> We should make a release at some point, 0.10 is way too old.

Plan:

1. Apply some waiting *easy* patches with bugfixes and enhancements, as 
I find them in the Tracker on SF or in forks out there (pointers to 
others welcome; I can look at ADI and on github for urjtag but are there 
more? Which are most interesting / enhanced?)

2. Release

3. Apply more patches, after discussions and probably some iterations to 
get the issue/code/etc. right

Or should we postpone release 2. after 3.? Now that, as far as I 
understand, it's probably too late to rush a release targetted for 
Debian experimental ... so "we have time"?

Regarding git & github, I won't object to move there because that's 
certainly a good way to go; but at the moment, I'd rather like to spend 
on working on the issues (in SF tracker, and with SVN) and *later* spend 
time on migration... Does this sound reasonable?

Regards,
Kolja




Am 05.12.2016 um 08:41 schrieb Benjamin Henrion:
> On Sun, Dec 4, 2016 at 9:24 PM, Geert Stappers <stapp...@debian.org> wrote:
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> Urjtag is already in Debian.
>>
>> The previous maintainer asked for adaption by a new maintainer.
>>  ( https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=796820 )
>>
>> It is me who is stepping forward.
>>  ( https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=796820#35 )
>>
>>
>> With this e-mail introduce I myself.
>>
>> Geert Stappers  Linux System engineer as day job, at night also computer
>> and electronics related stuff. Earlier in my career I did electronic
>> design. an upcoming hobby projects will be my first encounter with JTAG.
>>
>> I want to do that with a recent version of urjtag in Debian.
>
> We should make a release at some point, 0.10 is way too old.
>

-- 
Mr. K. Waschk - Hamburg - Germany

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, SlashDot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________
UrJTAG-development mailing list
UrJTAG-development@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/urjtag-development

Reply via email to