Hi!
Bugreport: current git urjrag compilation fail
System: current MSYS2/mingw32
File: /urjtag/src/tap/cable/dirtyjtag.c
Error: re-defines function min() defined in the
/mingw32/i686-w64-mingw32/include/minwindef.h
included from /mingw32/include/libusb-1.0/libusb.h
-> /mingw32/i686-w64-mingw32/include/windows.h
-> mingw32/i686-w64-mingw32/include/windef.h
(part of Mingw Win32 SDK).
Packages: libusb 1.0 installed
make[3]: Entering directory '/c/build/urjtag-git/urjtag/src/tap'
depbase=`echo cable/dirtyjtag.lo | sed 's|[^/]*$|.deps/&|;s|\.lo$||'`;\
/bin/sh ../../libtool --tag=CC --mode=compile gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H
-I. -I../.. -I../../include/urjtag -I../.. -I../../include
-DNO_W32_PSEUDO_MODIFIERS -D_NO_W32_PSEUDO_MODIFIERS
-IC:/msys32/mingw32/include/libusb-1.0 -Wall -Wmissing-prototypes
-Wstrict-prototypes -Wpointer-arith -g -O2 -MT cable/dirtyjtag.lo -MD
-MP -MF $depbase.Tpo -c -o cable/dirtyjtag.lo cable/dirtyjtag.c &&\
mv -f $depbase.Tpo $depbase.Plo
libtool: compile: gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I../..
-I../../include/urjtag -I../.. -I../../include
-DNO_W32_PSEUDO_MODIFIERS -D_NO_W32_PSEUDO_MODIFIERS
-IC:/msys32/mingw32/include/libusb-1.0 -Wall -Wmissing-prototypes
-Wstrict-prototypes -Wpointer-arith -g -O2 -MT cable/dirtyjtag.lo -MD
-MP -MF cable/.deps/dirtyjtag.Tpo -c cable/dirtyjtag.c -DDLL_EXPORT
-DPIC -o cable/.libs/dirtyjtag.o
In file included from C:/msys32/mingw32/i686-w64-mingw32/include/windef.h:8,
from C:/msys32/mingw32/i686-w64-mingw32/include/windows.h:69,
from C:/msys32/mingw32/include/libusb-1.0/libusb.h:76,
from ./usbconn/libusb.h:31,
from cable/dirtyjtag.c:8:
cable/dirtyjtag.c:113:16: error: expected identifier or '(' before 'int'
113 | static int min(int a, int b) {
| ^~~
cable/dirtyjtag.c:113:12: error: expected ')' before '<' token
113 | static int min(int a, int b) {
| ^~~
cable/dirtyjtag.c:113:12: error: expected ')' before '?' token
113 | static int min(int a, int b) {
| ^~~
make[3]: *** [Makefile:778: cable/dirtyjtag.lo] Error 1
I do not have /not need a dirtyjtag, just a bugreport.
Unfortunately, I can't provide patch. Should I completely remove
min() function or just rename it to something like dirty_min() ?
--
-=AV=-
_______________________________________________
UrJTAG-development mailing list
UrJTAG-development@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/urjtag-development
