On Sun, Sep 14, 2008 at 01:14:21PM -0400, Ian Ward wrote: > I want your opinion, which would you rather use?
If those are the only two options, I prefer conui. It's easier to say and sounds more individual than consoleui. (There are many uninteresting unfinished projects on SourceForge and they tend to have uninteresting names. I read "consoleui" and I think of all those projects. I know Urwid is not like those projects, but that's still my impression of the name "consoleui".) Have you thought of any names that emphasize what's special about Urwid? Rendering to screen or Web, being written in Python, the ability to change the behavior of widgets or write new ones, and the ability to link a series of data items together into a global canvas or document (as the question- and-answer demo shows -- you have two text fields, but they act more like one object than two). The typical widget library doesn't have any of those features. -- Derek _______________________________________________ Urwid mailing list [email protected] http://lists.excess.org/mailman/listinfo/urwid
