On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 10:56 PM, Ian Ward <[email protected]> wrote: > Oh, I see what happened. The reference docs are broken and just > showing copies of the same classes. Read the source instead, I'll fix > the docs on the site soon.
Thank you for fixing this, I just saw that the docs were updated. Now I have the question I originally wanted to ask: Why use a TreeNode at all? Why not use a ParentNode everywhere? The leaf nodes would then, instead of being TreeNodes, just be ParentNodes without any children. This way, if I wanted to add something to a leaf node, I can just simply add a child node to it, since it is already a ParentNode. Otherwise, I would have to convert the leaf node from a TreeNode to a ParentNode, and then add the child node. Does this make sense? Thanks, Alex _______________________________________________ Urwid mailing list [email protected] http://lists.excess.org/mailman/listinfo/urwid
