On Sat, Jul 21, 2012 at 2:44 PM, Ian Ward <[email protected]> wrote: > > This way, if I wanted to add something to a leaf node, I can just simply > > add a child node to it, since it is already a ParentNode. > > These "Node" classes were contributed earlier by someone that factored > them out of the browse.py example program.
Ah ok, I understand. Node and TreeNode are relics of files and directories from browse.py -- everything makes sense now. > I would accept a patch to make them the same "TreeNode" class as long > as the examples that use them don't break. My python-fu is weak, but I will continue to code against the library and will contribute where I can. thanks, Alex _______________________________________________ Urwid mailing list [email protected] http://lists.excess.org/mailman/listinfo/urwid
