On Wed, 1 Jun 2005, Alan Horkan wrote: > Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2005 13:58:07 +0100 (BST) > From: Alan Horkan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Christian Neumair <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Cc: [email protected], [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [Usability] Modifiers + Scroll => Zoom, which modifiers to use? > > > On Mon, 30 May 2005, Christian Neumair wrote: > > > Date: Mon, 30 May 2005 23:22:02 +0200 > > From: Christian Neumair <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To: [email protected] > > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: [Usability] Modifiers + Scroll => Zoom, which modifiers to use? > > > > Bug 79352 [1] suggested that "shift-mousewheel could zoom in / out on > > nautilus views", which sounded like a good idea. Now that Nautilus HEAD > > zooms the current directory view when the user presses shift+zoom, Mike > > Miller suggested [2] to use the ctrl key as zoom-triggering scroll > > modifier, since other applications (many win apps, probably firefox or > > mozilla) have this binding. Also note that currently, Epiphany has ctrl > > +scroll bound to quick scroll (double-stepped). > > > > Windows(/FF [probably]): > > ctrl+scroll: zoom > > > > GIMP, Nautilus: > > shift+scroll: zoom > > > > we have to decide whether consistency with win is important here, or > > whether double-stepped scrolling should be bound to ctrl. > > Any opinions? > > > > [1] http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=79352 > > [2] http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=79352#c8 > > What version of the GIMP are you using? > > The GIMP changed to be consistent with Inskcape and everyone else a while > back (although not many releases will included the change) and used the
Found the relevant post from the mailing list archives http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg09045.html _______________________________________________ Usability mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/usability
