On Sat, 2005-10-29 at 21:15 +0100, Bastien Nocera wrote: > On Sat, 2005-10-29 at 20:43 +0100, Alan Horkan wrote: > > On Sat, 29 Oct 2005, Tim Steenvoorden wrote: > <snip> > > > Very neat because they don't use "Open..."- or "New.."-items. > > > * Totem uses a firs menu called "Movie" (which is bad, you can also play > > Why is it bad exactly? Totem is a movie player, and can also play audio > files. But it's mainly a movie player. >
It is bad because it removes any chance of consistency between applications such as media players. I do not see why more people do not see the issue with not having consistent interfaces between applications. If a person knows how to use something already, then why force them to learn something new? There are plenty of strong standard interfaces within the desktop computer world already, so why try to sabotage that consistency? I am not saying things like the File menu or Edit menu are ideal, but destroying these consistencies does not offer any real innovation that will make it easier for users. Eric _______________________________________________ Usability mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/usability
