In my working life as an ict-engineer it was most of the times Microsoft related, so starting with Visual Basic 6/SQL Server decades ago and ending up with .NET/C# nowadays not to mention the SharePoint (365) and BizTalk implementations... But I must say I have only worked for companies who were Microsoft Dev Partners.
On 06/10/2019, 17:37, "use-livecode on behalf of Jjs via use-livecode" <use-livecode-boun...@lists.runrev.com on behalf of use-livecode@lists.runrev.com> wrote: Well in terms of jobs here in NL, most asked is Java, PHP, JavaScript,C++,SQL and a few others. The rest almost never. Richmond via use-livecode <use-livecode@lists.runrev.com> schreef op 6 oktober 2019 08:37:13 CEST: > > >On 6.10.19 1:59, Mark Wieder via use-livecode wrote: >> On 10/5/19 3:36 PM, Richard Gaskin via use-livecode wrote: >> >>> But this month LC broke new ground: >>> >>> For the first time since I've been tracking TIOBE, LC IS NOW IN THE >>> UPPER 50, ranked as the 49th most popular language: >>> >>> https://www.tiobe.com/tiobe-index/ >> >> Great news!, I think... note that the TIOBE rating is based on lines >> of code written, not popularity. > >Lines of code written where? > >Lines of code written in what context? > >Are the TIOBE people able to stick their virtual noses into every >computer on the planet >and see who is doing what with what programming language? > >This all seems a bit specious. > >Frankly I'd be far, far more interested to know in what contexts >different programming languages are used. > >Over here, in Bulgaria, something like 90% of IT companies are hooked >on >C++, and the rest on C#, >while high schools seem to be split between C++/# and Visual BASIC. But > >Bulgaria is an "ever so slightly >retro" country that is very small indeed, so, statistically probably >has >very little bearing on the global >situation. >> >> I'm not fond of metrics based on lines of code written. Since >LiveCode >> packs so much power into a single statement vs the number of line of >> code it takes to do the same job in most other languages, I'd think >> that we're actually much higher in the standings than a simple >> quantitative statistic would indicate. > >Indeed. > >And quantative is not necessarily qualitative. >> >> What did we knock out of place to get there? I see we're only 0.001% >> above Crystal, whatever that is. >? Meth ? > >The fact that LiveCode is at position 49 is, nevertheless, good, as it >might attract the attention >of the sort of people who make decisions of what sort of programming >language to use on >its popularity: and while that might seem a bit naff, every little >advance helps. > > >_______________________________________________ >use-livecode mailing list >use-livecode@lists.runrev.com >Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your >subscription preferences: >http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode -- Verstuurd vanaf mijn Android apparaat met K-9 Mail. _______________________________________________ use-livecode mailing list use-livecode@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode _______________________________________________ use-livecode mailing list use-livecode@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode