Re: Looping though a numerically indexed array

[David Bovill via use-livecode]

Ah that explains it. The extents works but I seem to remember for each is 
considerably faster
On 2 Sep 2020, 16:29 +0100, Brian Milby via use-livecode 
<use-livecode@lists.runrev.com>, wrote:
> As long as the array is indexed starting at 1 with no gaps it should work by 
> looping for each element. I just did a quick test to confirm. I built a 100 
> element array and it looped in order. I deleted 2 keys and then it didn’t. I 
> then added those 2 missing keys back and it worked again.
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> > On Sep 2, 2020, at 10:55 AM, David Bovill via use-livecode 
> > <use-livecode@lists.runrev.com> wrote:
> >
> > I’m pretty sure there must be a way to efficiently loop through numerically 
> > indexed arrays
> >
> > Repeat for each key and repeat for each element does not seem to sort the 
> > keys in numeric order,. Of course I can get the keys and sort them before 
> > repeating - but is there a more efficient way?
> > _______________________________________________
> > use-livecode mailing list
> > use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
> > Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your 
> > subscription preferences:
> > http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode
>
> _______________________________________________
> use-livecode mailing list
> use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
> Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
> preferences:
> http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode
_______________________________________________
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode