Possible : stack with transparent backgound?

[David Bovill via use-livecode]

Id like to create a stack  - has to be a stack - and for the text and some 
other elements to be visible but the stack background to be transparent - is 
this possible with some combination of inks and masks and blend levels?
On 2 Sep 2020, 22:03 +0100, Bob Sneidar via use-livecode 
<use-livecode@lists.runrev.com>, wrote:
> It appears I have that backwards?
>
> Bob S
>
>
> > On Sep 2, 2020, at 8:28 AM, Bob Sneidar <bobsnei...@iotecdigital.com> wrote:
> >
> > Ditto, and I am not sure what noticeable impact one method would have over 
> > another. There was some blurb a long time ago about how these keys are 
> > internally sorted. I believe what was proposed is that a set of NUMERIC 
> > keys beginning with 0 would actually sort correctly.
> >
> > Bob S
> >
> >
> > > On Sep 2, 2020, at 8:24 AM, Ralph DiMola via use-livecode 
> > > <use-livecode@lists.runrev.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > David,
> > >
> > > Nope you have to sort them NUMERIC. As you said this is the only way I 
> > > know of. I do this all the time. I don't know of any other way.
> > >
> > > put the keys of tMyArray into tKeys
> > > sort lines of tKeys numeric
> > > repeat for each line tKey in tKeys
> > >
> > > -- do what you want with tMyArray[tKey]
> > > -- this line will put the array data in the message box (assuming there 
> > > is no other sub keys in each numeric array entry).
> > > put tMyArray[tKey] into tMyVar
> > >
> > > end repeat
> > >
> > > Ralph DiMola
> > > IT Director
> > > Evergreen Information Services
> > > rdim...@evergreeninfo.net
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: use-livecode [mailto:use-livecode-boun...@lists.runrev.com] On 
> > > Behalf Of David Bovill via use-livecode
> > > Sent: Wednesday, September 02, 2020 10:55 AM
> > > To: How to use LiveCode
> > > Cc: David Bovill
> > > Subject: Looping though a numerically indexed array
> > >
> > > I’m pretty sure there must be a way to efficiently loop through 
> > > numerically indexed arrays
> > >
> > > Repeat for each key and repeat for each element does not seem to sort the 
> > > keys in numeric order,. Of course I can get the keys and sort them before 
> > > repeating - but is there a more efficient way?
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > use-livecode mailing list
> > > use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
> > > Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your 
> > > subscription preferences:
> > > http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode
> > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > use-livecode mailing list
> > > use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
> > > Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your 
> > > subscription preferences:
> > > http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> use-livecode mailing list
> use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
> Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
> preferences:
> http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode
_______________________________________________
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode