I think I’ll head over there and. See if there is any will to maintain an aspect of the language as open source - I think there are a couple of options:
1. The server 2. The language with a focus on was and web I would think that with these components open, this is in no way incompatible with a closed source development platform for mobile etc - people will still. Pay for the tools but the core of the language would be open.MModern tools make the development of the language aspect something a community can do and as it is is relatively cutting edge - something an open source community might be willing to undertake. Would need new blood I think. 📆 Schedule a call with me On 1 Sep 2021, 14:30 +0100, Bernard Devlin via use-livecode <use-livecode@lists.runrev.com>, wrote: > FWIW over on the forums the sentiment seems to be mostly hostile to these > changes. Many are talking of collecting and hosting past "community" > installers to get around these changes by LC Ltd, others talking of jumping > ship. Over there the attitude is "the sky is falling". I can only assume > many of them used LC simply because it was free of charge, disliking that > doing so in future will entail them making some contribution to the cost of > progress. > > Regards, Bernard > _______________________________________________ > use-livecode mailing list > use-livecode@lists.runrev.com > Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription > preferences: > http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode _______________________________________________ use-livecode mailing list use-livecode@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode