Now THAT is tech support! 

Bob S


> On Sep 24, 2025, at 12:24 AM, Mark Waddingham via use-livecode 
> <use-livecode@lists.runrev.com> wrote:
> 
> On 2025-09-24 05:36, J. Landman Gay via use-livecode wrote:
>> Actually, maybe the resource fork isn't the problem. What are the usual 
>> reasons a stack isn't a stack?
> 
> So I don't think the engine has ever looked at the resource fork of hypercard 
> stacks when it tries to load them...
> 
> The only reason a stack isn't considered a stack is if the engine can't load 
> it - i.e. there's an error while parsing the binary data.
> 
> Its possible the stack has been compressed with Stuff-It or similar (which 
> was quite common as doing so allowed the resource fork to be preserved 
> alongside the data fork, but without the resulting file having a resource 
> fork) - if that is the case here then that would be why the engine doesn't 
> like it.
> 
> If you send the stack to support we can take a quick look :)
> 
> Warmest Regards,
> 
> Mark.
> 
> -- 
> Mark Waddingham ~ m...@livecode.com ~ http://www.livecode.com/
> LiveCode: Build Amazing Things
> 
> _______________________________________________
> use-livecode mailing list
> use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
> Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
> preferences:
> http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode


_______________________________________________
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode

Reply via email to