Now THAT is tech support! Bob S
> On Sep 24, 2025, at 12:24 AM, Mark Waddingham via use-livecode > <use-livecode@lists.runrev.com> wrote: > > On 2025-09-24 05:36, J. Landman Gay via use-livecode wrote: >> Actually, maybe the resource fork isn't the problem. What are the usual >> reasons a stack isn't a stack? > > So I don't think the engine has ever looked at the resource fork of hypercard > stacks when it tries to load them... > > The only reason a stack isn't considered a stack is if the engine can't load > it - i.e. there's an error while parsing the binary data. > > Its possible the stack has been compressed with Stuff-It or similar (which > was quite common as doing so allowed the resource fork to be preserved > alongside the data fork, but without the resulting file having a resource > fork) - if that is the case here then that would be why the engine doesn't > like it. > > If you send the stack to support we can take a quick look :) > > Warmest Regards, > > Mark. > > -- > Mark Waddingham ~ m...@livecode.com ~ http://www.livecode.com/ > LiveCode: Build Amazing Things > > _______________________________________________ > use-livecode mailing list > use-livecode@lists.runrev.com > Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription > preferences: > http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode _______________________________________________ use-livecode mailing list use-livecode@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode