Richmond wrote:
Nothing is intrinsically wrong with RevNet, it is just very out-of-date.
Agreed. It could use some pruning of the stacks it has access to, and a freshened appearance.
Those and more are on my to-do list, but client work pays for that so I must continue to give priority to shipping those client projects for now, in hopes of a nifty new revamp for RevNet toward the end of summer.
If anyone wants to contribute to either RevNet or LiveCode Journal, both are community efforts and your participation is welcome:
<http://livecodejournal.com/forum/viewforum.php?f=28> -- Richard Gaskin Fourth World LiveCode training and consulting: http://www.fourthworld.com Webzine for LiveCode developers: http://www.LiveCodeJournal.com Follow me on Twitter: http://twitter.com/FourthWorldSys _______________________________________________ use-livecode mailing list use-livecode@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode
