Alejandro Tejada wrote:
A Portable LiveCode Server would help a lot
towards the adoption of it.
What do you mean by "portable"?
Servers run many services, LiveCode being just one. They also need DNS.
So using LC Server under Apache at a Web host seems a good way to go, no?
Besides, neither mchttpd nor any other standalone will do quite what LC
Server does in terms of mixing HTML with executable LiveCode. The
merge function available to standalones is quite different from the one
called implicitly in Server (no control structures, for example).
mchttd can be a good solution for providing specialized services, but
for integration with publicly accessible servers LC Server is the way to go.
--
Richard Gaskin
Fourth World
LiveCode training and consulting: http://www.fourthworld.com
Webzine for LiveCode developers: http://www.LiveCodeJournal.com
Follow me on Twitter: http://twitter.com/FourthWorldSys
_______________________________________________
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode
