Mark Wieder wrote:
Richard-
Friday, July 25, 2014, 7:18:12 PM, you wrote:
i thought some sort of default came into play without further modifiers, no?
What happens now when you call it with no modifiers?
I thought Monte was suggesting this as an enhancement?
He was, but as I wrote I thought the reason we had to write the
silly-sounding "for neither" was because with no args it uses some sort
of defaults.
Well, I just tested it and it seems that the defaults it uses are
exactly what's been proposed here.
Should I submit a Dictionary bug to have this simpler less silly form
documented?
And FWIW I only tested with a shell call to aplay - anyone else want to
confirm this before I file the report?
--
Richard Gaskin
Fourth World Systems
Software Design and Development for Desktop, Mobile, and Web
____________________________________________________________
ambassa...@fourthworld.com http://www.FourthWorld.com
_______________________________________________
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode
