Folks: Reading this kinda makes my head spin. Now I’m thinking it is going to be a heck of a lot more robust for my situation, as a single developer, to not use behaviors at all, but to have a single (possibly script only) substack that holds all of the handlers that I would normally use as behaviors, and just put a call to that handler in each button. I can use “the target” or “me” as a passed variable to make the action specific to a particular control.
This approach seems a lot less prone to idiosyncrasies and more easily transportable to other apps, to me. It also means that all of my “behavior type scripts” would sit in a single script-only stack, which would make it a lot more convenient to access and edit than a bunch of small script only stacks sitting in my project browser. Am I wrong. misguided, foolish, or brilliant? Best, Bill > On Mar 31, 2016, at 8:04 AM, Richard Gaskin <ambassa...@fourthworld.com> > wrote: > > Sannyasin Brahmanathaswami wrote: > > > On March 30, 2016 at 6:17:20 PM, Richard Gaskin wrote: > > > >> in brief: > >> 1. Open them > > > > # this did not work for me earlier today > > What exactly happened? > _______________________________________________ use-livecode mailing list use-livecode@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode
