The suggestion of Alex is a reasonable option for this iOS only deploy problem in my opinion. As long as Apple's Apps Store's Terms of Service (ToS) clashes with the GPL a temporary solution could be a Hosted iOS Builder service. This can be a subscription model ($/year) or you pay per service build ($). The technical implementation of such a solution cannot be difficult and it would be nice to offer this in the user login section of LiveCode products.
Just my 2 cents -----Original Message----- From: use-livecode [mailto:use-livecode-boun...@lists.runrev.com] On Behalf Of Monte Goulding Sent: maandag 2 mei 2016 07:14 To: How to use LiveCode <use-livecode@lists.runrev.com> Subject: Re: Standalones on el Capitan? > On 2 May 2016, at 9:23 AM, Alex Tweedly <a...@tweedly.net> wrote: > > For example, would it be possible to create a version of that allows building > IOS standalones under commercial license, but nothing else. Then such a User > could build IOS standalones (non-GPL), other standalones (under GPL), they > could NOT distribute or use encrypted stacks, etc. To be honest I’m not sure how we got from LiveCode Ltd generously releasing a GPL version which gives a huge number of users the opportunity to use the platform at no cost to LiveCode Ltd must provide a no/negligible cost option for deploying apps everywhere. _______________________________________________ use-livecode mailing list use-livecode@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode _______________________________________________ use-livecode mailing list use-livecode@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode
