I don't quite know where you got that idea from.
I would be very much surprised if Kevin Miller had actually stated that;
it might
be that you concluded that on the basis of something he said; which is
not the
same thing at all.
I would be extremely interested if you could post a link to that thread.
There are plenty of software packages offered under a variety of licences:
yesterday I downloaded a version of Draftsight which let me have a copy for
personal use for nothing, but charges architects lots of money.
Richmond.
On 4.05.2016 20:14, Robert Mann wrote:
Just a precision though :
In a former, not so old, enormous thread dealing with the FOSS license and
trying to understand what it meant in practice, one of the conclusion was
that *only Livecode can dual license*. Nobody else can do that. And Kevin
Miller really pushed hard on that point.
--
View this message in context:
http://runtime-revolution.278305.n4.nabble.com/Revenue-and-the-Open-Source-edition-tp4704079p4704244.html
Sent from the Revolution - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
_______________________________________________
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode
_______________________________________________
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode
