I may be mistaken, but I think that script locals are accessible to a behavior script. If so, you could keep the script local variables in the card, and the handlers in a library or backscript. I will set up a test for that.
Bob S > On Feb 23, 2017, at 14:51 , Peter Bogdanoff via use-livecode > <use-livecode@lists.runrev.com> wrote: > > Bob, > > This is a good question. In my case, each card script has script local > variables that are used only for that card. > > In this unusual case (I’m creating a text search method) I need to access the > contents of those variables from another stack. > > I indeed would like to move common handlers to a stack or library script, but > these handlers use many local variables relevant to the individual cards. I > have not yet thought of a simple way to use common handlers without a LOT of > passing of local variable data. _______________________________________________ use-livecode mailing list use-livecode@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode
