I may be mistaken, but I think that script locals are accessible to a behavior 
script. If so, you could keep the script local variables in the card, and the 
handlers in a library or backscript. I will set up a test for that. 

Bob S


> On Feb 23, 2017, at 14:51 , Peter Bogdanoff via use-livecode 
> <use-livecode@lists.runrev.com> wrote:
> 
> Bob,
> 
> This is a good question. In my case, each card script has script local 
> variables that are used only for that card.
> 
> In this unusual case (I’m creating a text search method) I need to access the 
> contents of those variables from another stack.
> 
> I indeed would like to move common handlers to a stack or library script, but 
> these handlers use many local variables relevant to the individual cards. I 
> have not yet thought of a simple way to use common handlers without a LOT of 
> passing of local variable data.


_______________________________________________
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode

Reply via email to