> Mark W. wrote: > > and most of these legacy Blend Modes: > > clear, noop, notSrcAnd, notSrcAndReverse, > > notSrcCopy, notSrcOr, notSrcOrReverse, > > notSrcXor, reverse, set, srcAnd, > > srcAndReverse, srcCopy, srcOr, > > srcOrReverse, srcXor, blend, addPin > > addOver, subPin, transparent > > adMin, addMax
> We're still on the fency about all of these - I do wonder how > much they are used anymore particularly as they do not fit into > the RGBA rendering model which everyone uses anymore and as such > are incredibly inefficient. (They will never be acceleratable, > for example). > I'd be surprised if people couldn't get similar effects by using > appropriate blend inks - if they are still in use at all. > Ali L. wrote: > To be fair, the docs claim the legacy blend modes have been deprecated > since LC 5! We've supported them for quite a long time post-deprecation... 1. Please read this twice and don't cry ... The default blendLevel of each and every LC object that has an ink is "srcCopy" --- 'incredibly inefficient' as you judge it. 2. How do you define a "similar" effect? 3. Please tell me for example which "similar" blend effect allows a dark theme in the script editor which is currently simly done by setting the fields ink to "notSrcCopy". _______________________________________________ use-livecode mailing list use-livecode@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode