We have computers automate these processes, but always with a human ready to 
intervene. The computer will act based upon the inputs it receives. If the 
inputs go wrong, you may have an exceptional diagnostic routine running to 
detect it and act accordingly, but only a human can make a judgement at 
"runtime" if you will. 

The value to using computers in these instances is that computers can react 
much more quickly, and given all the corrects inputs, and assuming it is 
functioning correctly, will always make the right "decision" based upon a 
predetermined set of parameters. A human can be slow. A human can make 
mistakes. A human can become malicious. A computer cannot. A computer can 
however, lack all the inputs to make what we would call a right decision. 

Take the classic arguement of a person walking a dog. The dog breaks away right 
in front of an oncoming car with no time to stop. Does the car swerve to avoid 
the living mammal right in front of it and hit the dog owner instead? How could 
you program a computer to make that distinction? 

If computers are going to drive cars, then it needs to be done all at once. A 
switch gets thrown and now no one's car will work unless the computer is 
driving it. Also, I think it would be better if auto driving cars were 
restricted to places without crossing traffic, like highways/freeways. A car 
leaving a freeway would have to come to a stop and the driver should have to 
take control to proceed on streets. 

Ideally self driving cars should never be based entirely upon optics. For this 
sort of thing to be really as safe as can be managed, every car would need to 
have beacons at the corners and maybe along the sides, and the cars would need 
to be in communication with all the other cars within a certain distance of it. 
People however would not accept this because there would be the potential to 
track people without them knowing it's being done. (Of course that is likely 
happening now but that's another discussion). 

Bob S

> On Mar 30, 2018, at 09:51 , Mark Waddingham via use-livecode 
> <use-livecode@lists.runrev.com> wrote:
> In terms of computers driving cars then we let computers monitor and 
> interpret sensors for humans in nuclear power stations. We let them 'drive' 
> very large aircraft and provide simulated feedback and sensor interpretation 
> there to pilots. Same for trains, trams, vehicles in factories and 
> warehouses... So why not cars? ;)

use-livecode mailing list
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 

Reply via email to