On Saturday, March 23, 2002, at 10:58 AM, Rob Cozens wrote:
> While I favor support for pointers, handles, etc. that does NOT > mean I support their implementation in Xtalk with cryptic @ or @@ > syntax al la C. Any support for these features should fit > naturally into Xtalk: eg "get the address of someVariable" seems > natural for a pointer. How about... put the id of variable oneVariable into pointerToVariable put the "blah blah" into variable ID pointerToVariable Dar _______________________________________________ use-revolution mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
