>I know that Revolution uses the "Metacard engine". Why, then, do we have -both- >Metacard and Revolution? What I mean by that is: Why does Metacard permit Revolution >to utilize its "engine" when people buying Rev licenses are probably giving most of >the money to Revolution with a small "engine fee"(?) going back to Metacard? > >Maybe I'm not seeing the bigger picture or I have some other perspective problem. > >I guess the other thing that sort of bothers me is this: If Metacard licenses its >"engine" to Revolution, what happens if they decide -not- to license it at some time? > >Barry
I'm sure they've worked it out so both are satisfied with the deal. Revolution is pursuing markets that MetaCard hasn't, doesn't, and isn't likely to. I would assume Revolution is covered so that MetaCard can't withdraw from the agreement. -- regards, Geoff Canyon [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ use-revolution mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
