On 17/4/02 3:20 am, Barry Levine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I know that Revolution uses the "Metacard engine". Why, then, do we have > -both- Metacard and Revolution? What I mean by that is: Why does > Metacard permit Revolution to utilize its "engine" when people buying > Rev licenses are probably giving most of the money to Revolution with a > small "engine fee"(?) going back to Metacard? > > Maybe I'm not seeing the bigger picture or I have some other perspective > problem. > > I guess the other thing that sort of bothers me is this: If Metacard > licenses its "engine" to Revolution, what happens if they decide -not- > to license it at some time?
We do license technology from MetaCard corporation. The license agreement is complex and not publicly available. But suffice to say that it is a long term and mutually beneficial agreement which covers this type of question and a whole lot more. If you have any further questions, please feel free to address them to me directly off list. Kind regards, Kevin Kevin Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://www.runrev.com/> Runtime Revolution Limited - The Solution for Software Development Tel: +44 (0) 870 747 1165. Fax: +44 (0)1639 830 707. _______________________________________________ use-revolution mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
