At 12:28 am -0500 24/4/02, J. Landman Gay wrote: >There is no need ever to "send in 0". Simply issue the command. These >two lines are equivalent: > > send "myHandler" to me in 0 > myHandler
This is not quite true, Jacque. In the following script, commenting in and out the "in 0 seconds" produces different results. on mouseUp send "myHandler" to me ##in 0 milliseconds put "HERE 1" end mouseUp on myHandler put "HERE 2" end myHandler Using the "in <time>" extension to the send command will cause the currently running handler to complete before the "called" handler is run. You can see an example of this in the libUrl library, which sends the user's callback message (from a "load url" command) in 0 milliseconds. It does this to prevent the user's callback handler from becoming "intermingled" with the libUrl script. For example, the user's callback handler might do something (exit to top??) that would prevent the libUrl handler completing properly. Cheers Dave Cragg _______________________________________________ use-revolution mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
