On Saturday, December 28, 2002, at 12:24 PM, Richard Gaskin wrote:
One more thing... if MC/Rev had called this property "sharedContents" rather
than "backgroundBehavior" I think it could have cleared up a lot of the
confusion...
Or even just "shared", and mark the token "background" as depricated and included only for compatibility with less flexible systems.
Would "the backgrounds", then be "the sharedGroups"?
Dar Scott _______________________________________________ use-revolution mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
