On Sat, 28 Dec 2002 11:53:40, Dar Scott wrote:
>The related question that perhaps should be asked is whether
>we should ask for or suggest that this whole area is simplified,
>cleaned up and made more powerful as well as easier to
> understand.
I liked the approach to this problem used in OMO (Oracle Media Objects).
They had background - with same behavior and message passing hierarchy
as in HyperCard
And they had background groups and card groups.
No confusion, for me personally, unlike I had and still have in MC/Rev
scheme.
Best regards
Tariel Gogoberidze
_______________________________________________
use-revolution mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
- Re: Re[7]: groups and backgro... Geoff Canyon
- Re: Re[7]: groups and background Mark Swindell
- Re: Fw: Re[7]: groups and background Ken Ray
- Re: Fw: Re[7]: groups and background Dar Scott
- Re: Re[7]: groups and background Geoff Canyon
- Re: Re[7]: groups and background Dar Scott
- Re: Re[7]: groups and background Dar Scott
- Re: Re[7]: groups and background Geoff Canyon
- Re: Re[7]: groups and background Dar Scott
- Re: Re[7]: groups and background Dar Scott
- Re: Re[7]: groups and background Tariel Gogoberidze
- Re: Re[7]: groups and background J. Landman Gay
- Re: Re[7]: groups and background Dar Scott
- Underlined characters in button label? Mark Swindell
- Re: Re[7]: groups and background erik hansen
- Re: Re[7]: groups and background Dar Scott
- Re: Re[7]: groups and background Jan Schenkel
- Re: Re[7]: groups and background Mark Swindell
- Re: Re[7]: groups and background J. Landman Gay
- Re: Re[7]: groups and background erik hansen
- Re: Re[7]: groups and background Dar Scott
