On Monday, January 6, 2003, at 01:31 PM, erik hansen wrote:
so there IS a RunRev specific reason to use the the "background" concept.I think the double "the" typo is significant. I think we run into trouble in thinking of "the" background concept. There seems to be two, even though both seem to have a basis in history. There is background in the sense of backgroundBehaviour and background in the sense of thinking of groups belonging to the stack. The backgroundbehaviour path modification, automatic placement and backgroundNames() are related to the first concept. The rest of the uses of the word "background" seem to be related to the second, though there may be a few for the first concept that I missed.
Dar Scott
_______________________________________________
use-revolution mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
