> Either approach works. I think the point is that Rob's "unusual > behaviour", or "bug" as one person put it, is in fact reasonably > expected behaviour and readily handled once the behaviour is grasped. > Yes this is reasonably expected behaviour if the message and parameters sent are formed into a string as Rob had done. I'd suggest, however, that there is a requirements bug in the send command where to send parameters they must be part of a string. How would one send an array parameter for example? What if you need to send the contents of a field and don't know if or how many commas occur in the field?
Perhaps rather or in addition to using a string a message expression could be surrounded by parenthesis so it is a logical block but still not concatenated. For example: send (myMessage x,y) to me in 6 seconds where x and y could be any type of variable including array. Anyway, my 2 cents (currently just over 1 cent US) Monte _______________________________________________ use-revolution mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
