On 19-nov-2007, at 19:00, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


2. Has anybody a personal quality comparison between the Sorenson 3 codec and the new H.264? Is H.264 actually now the "state of the art"? Which codec is the best quality choice in your eyes for offline content, no streaming,
not worrying of the file size?

Sorry, no idea :-)
If file size really doesn't matter, then why compress at all? Use DV- PAL or the like..


5. If you use a flash codec in a mov file. Has the output the same quality
as a native flash movie? - In your personal experience

No experience, sorry.
I'm no expert on flash video, but I seem to remember that Flash initially used the Cinepak codec, and now also supports the H.264 codec. But QT can't play Flash movies. QT supports Flash files only up to Flash 5 and Flash 5 only had very poor support of video.
_______________________________________________
use-revolution mailing list
[email protected]
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution

Reply via email to