Thanks Henk and Stephen Actually file size doesen't not matter, but I don't have to watch for the last bytes ;) Tiemo
> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- > Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:use-revolution- > [EMAIL PROTECTED] Im Auftrag von Henk van der Velden > Gesendet: Montag, 19. November 2007 19:32 > An: [email protected] > Betreff: Re: Quicktime and Encoder > > On 19-nov-2007, at 19:00, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > > >> 2. Has anybody a personal quality comparison between the Sorenson > >> 3 codec > >> and the new H.264? Is H.264 actually now the "state of the art"? > >> Which codec > >> is the best quality choice in your eyes for offline content, no > >> streaming, > >> not worrying of the file size? > > > > Sorry, no idea :-) > If file size really doesn't matter, then why compress at all? Use DV- > PAL or the like.. > > > >> > >> 5. If you use a flash codec in a mov file. Has the output the same > >> quality > >> as a native flash movie? - In your personal experience > > > > No experience, sorry. > I'm no expert on flash video, but I seem to remember that Flash > initially used the Cinepak codec, and now also supports the H.264 > codec. But QT can't play Flash movies. QT supports Flash files only > up to Flash 5 and Flash 5 only had very poor support of video. > _______________________________________________ > use-revolution mailing list > [email protected] > Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your > subscription preferences: > http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution _______________________________________________ use-revolution mailing list [email protected] Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
