Mark,
No major point; just my own, personal observations as I seek to know
without just accepting someone else's opinion. I guess what I was
trying to point out was that even with "their" selection method(s),
there is probably some discoverable methodology - a pattern of some
sort, that would make their numbers predictable; thence not truly
random. Thanks for your observations, and I had no intention of being
argumentative about the topic; just a slow traffic morning. (smile)
Joe Wilkins
On Dec 16, 2007, at 8:13 AM, Mark Schonewille wrote:
Joe,
Could you please explain to me once more what point you are trying
to make?
Regarding te FAQ, I would write that too, if some space agency,
secret service or hospital might held me responsible if my data
appeared to be flawed.
Best regards,
Mark Schonewille
--
Economy-x-Talk Consulting and Software Engineering
http://economy-x-talk.com
http://www.salery.biz
Quickly extract data from your HyperCard stacks with DIFfersifier.
http://differsifier.economy-x-talk.com
Op 16-dec-2007, om 16:53 heeft Joe Lewis Wilkins het volgende
geschreven:
Hi Mark,
After reading a few of the site's FAQs, I can see that "they" have
a very high degree of confidence in the "randomness" they are
producing; however, as with all things in life, even "they" leave
the door open for the, what they consider to be remote
possibility, that even what they produce is not truly random.
Proving one way or another is just too much for anyone. Thanks for
your own thoughts.
Joe Wilkins
_______________________________________________
use-revolution mailing list
[email protected]
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your
subscription preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
_______________________________________________
use-revolution mailing list
[email protected]
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
